1.Ulijaszek, SJ (2003) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894.
7.McGill, R, Anwar, E, Orton, Let al. (2015) Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health 15, 457–457.
8.Hyseni, L, Atkinson, M, Bromley, Het al. (2016) The effects of policy actions to improve population dietary patterns and prevent diet-related non-communicable diseases: scoping review. Eur J Clin Nutr 71, 694–711.
9.Hartmann-Boyce, J, Bianchi, F, Piernas, Cet al. (2018) Grocery store interventions to change food purchasing behaviors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 107, 1004–1016.
10.Liberato, SC, Bailie, R & Brimblecombe, J (2014) Nutrition interventions at point-of-sale to encourage healthier food purchasing: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14, E919.
11.Adam, A & Jensen, JD (2016) What is the effectiveness of obesity related interventions at retail grocery stores and supermarkets? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 16, E1247.
12.Escaron, AL, Meinen, A, Nitzke, SAet al. (2013) Supermarket and grocery store based interventions to promote healthful food choices and eating practices: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 10, E50.
13.Cameron, AJ, Charlton, E, Ngan, WWet al. (2016) A systematic review of the effectiveness of supermarket-based interventions involving product, promotion, or place on the healthiness of consumer purchases. Curr Nutr Rep 5, 129–138.
14.Teng, AM, Jones, AC, Mizdrak, Aet al. (2019) Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 20, 1187–1204.
15.Taillie, LS, Rivera, JA, Popkin, BMet al. (2017) Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico’s 8% nonessential food tax. Prev Med 105S, S37–S42.
16.Chaloupka, FJ, Straif, K & Leon, ME (2011) Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tob Control 20, 235–238.
17.Chisholm, D, Moro, D, Bertram, Met al. (2018) Are the “best buys” for alcohol control still valid? An update on the comparative cost-effectiveness of alcohol control strategies at the global level. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 79, 514–522.
19.Hawkes, C (2009) Sales promotions and food consumption. Nutr Rev 67, 333–342.
20.Santini, FdO, Vieira, VA, Sampaio, CHet al. (2016) Meta-analysis of the long- and short-term effects of sales promotions on consumer behavior. J Promot Manag 22, 425–442.
21.Neslin, SA & van Heerde, HJ (2009) Promotion dynamics. Found Trends Mark 3, 177–268.
22.van Heerde, HJ & Neslin, SA (2008) Sales promotion models. In Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, pp. 107–162 [Wierenga, B, editor]. Boston, MA: Springer US.
23.Bijmolt, THA, van Heerde, HJ & Pieters, RGM (2005) New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J Mark Res 42, 141–156.
24.Ailawadi, KL & Neslin, SA (1998) The effect of promotion on consumption: buying more and consuming it faster. J Mark Res 35, 390–398.10.1177/002224379803500309
25.Baohong, S (2005) Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Mark Sci 24, 430–443.
26.Nijs, VR, Dekimpe, MG, Steenkamp, J-BEMet al. (2001) The category-demand effects of price promotions. Mark Sci 20, 1–22.
27.Wansink, B & Deshpande, R (1994) ‘Out of sight, out of mind’: pantry stockpiling and brand-usage frequency. Mark Lett 5, 91–100.
28.Assunção, JL & Meyer, RJ (1993) The rational effect of price promotions on sales and consumption. Manag Sci 39, 517–535.
29.Gourville, JT & Soman, D (1998) Payment depreciation: the behavioral effects of temporally separating payments from consumption. J Consum Res 25, 160–174.
30.Soman, D & John, T. (2001) Transaction decoupling: how price bundling affects the decision to consume. J Mark Res 38, 30–44.
31.Folkes, V & Wheat, RD (1995) Consumers’ price perceptions of promoted products. J Retail 71, 317–328.
32.Wansink, B (1996) Can package size accelerate usage volume? J Mark 60, 1–14.
33.Chandon, P & Wansink, B (2002) When are stockpiled products consumed faster? A convenience-salience framework of postpurchase consumption incidence and quantity. J Mark Res 39, 321–335.
34.Wansink, B, Brasel, SA & Amjad, S (2000) The mystery of the cabinet castaway: why we buy products we never use. J Fam Consum Sci 92, 104–108.
35.Raghubir, P & Krishna, A (1999) Vital dimensions in volume perception: can the eye fool the stomach? J Mark Res 36, 313–326.
36.Cornelsen, L, Mazzocchi, M & Smith, R (2018) Between preferences and references: Evidence from Great Britain on asymmetric price elasticities. Quaderni di Dipartimento 1, 1–34.
37.Hendel, I & Nevo, A (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74, 1637–1673.
38.Chan, T, Narasimhan, C & Zhang, Q (2008) Decomposing promotional effects with a dynamic structural model of flexible consumption. J Mark Res 45, 487–498.
39.Liu, Y & Balachander, S (2014) How long has it been since the last deal? Consumer promotion timing expectations and promotional response. Quant Mark Econ 12, 85–126.10.1007/s11129-013-9141-3
40.Teunter, LH (2002) Analysis of sales promotion effects on household purchasing behavior. ERIM PhD Research Series in Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 262 p.
41.Van Heerde, HJ, Gupta, S & Wittink, DR (2003) Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. J Mark Res 40, 481–491.
42.Sun, B, Neslin, SA & Srinivasan, K (2003) Measuring the impact of promotions on brand switching when consumers are forward looking. J Mark Res 40, 389–405.
43.Van Heerde, JH, Leeflang, PSH & Wittink, DR (2004) Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Mark Sci 23, 317–334.
44.Nair, H, Dubé, J-P & Chintagunta, P (2005) Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Mark Sci 24, 444–460.
45.Ailawadi, K, Gedenk, K, Lutzky, Cet al. (2007) Decomposition of the sales impact of promotion-induced stockpiling. J Mark Res 44, 450–467.
46.Ebling, C & Klapper, D (2010) Modeling whether, what and how much to buy the right way: how important is the selectivity bias in purchase quantity outcomes? Rev Manag Sci 4, 171–199.